Ambedkar Castes In India

Ambedkar Castes In India PDF annihilation of caste by ambedkar pdf free download.

Ambedkar Castes In India PDF Free Download

Dear readers, here we are offering Ambedkar Castes in India PDF to all of you. On the occasion of Dr. Ambedkar’s 62nd Nirvana Day, it is necessary to consider the most important aspect of his thinking and philosophy. It is well known that Dr. Ambedkar’s philosophy greatly influenced the political conduct of 20th-century India.

But there is a great paucity of information on the most important points of his philosophy. It has been said many times that those who do politics in his name know that Babasaheb was against the caste system, but most people are in the dark about other things. It would be appropriate to mention some of those things today.

Ambedkar Castes in India PDF – Genesis

• Ambedkar believed that ethnically, all people are heterogeneous. According to him, the Indian Peninsula has not only a geographic unity but also a deeper and much more fundamental cultural unity. The unity of culture is the basis of homogeneity, which makes the problem of caste difficult to be explained. If the Hindu society were a mere federation of mutually exclusive units, the matter would be simple enough.
• But, the caste is a “parceling” of an already homogeneous unit, and the explanation of the genesis of caste is the explanation of this process of parceling.
• Ambedkar views the definitions of castes given by Émile Senart John Nesfield, H. H. Risley, and Dr Ketkar as incomplete or incorrect by themselves and all have missed the central point in the mechanism of the caste system. Senart’s “idea of pollution” is a characteristic of caste in so far as caste has a religious flavor.
• Nesfield states that the ‘absence of messing’ with those outside the Caste is one of its characteristics, but Nesfield has mistaken the effect for the cause, as caste is a closed group that naturally limits all social intercourse outside of one’s caste, including messing etc.
• Risley makes no new point that deserves special attention. Dr. Ambedkar elucidates that Ketkar’s definition of “prohibition of intermarriage” and “membership by autogeny” as two characteristics of caste are two aspects of one and the same thing but not two different things. The prohibition of intermarriage means limiting membership to those born within the group.
• Ambedkar has evaluated that endogamy (absence of intermarriage) is the only one that can be called the essence of caste and only characteristic that is peculiar to caste. No civilized society of today presents more survivals of primitive times than does the Indian society like the custom of exogamy.
• The creed of exogamy is not that spindles (blood-kins) cannot marry, but a marriage between sagotras (gotras or clans of the same class) is regarded as a sacrilege. In spite of the endogamy of the castes within them, exogamy is strictly observed and there are more rigorous penalties for violating exogamy than there are for violating endogamy. Thus “the Superposition of endogamy on exogamy means the creation of caste.”

Annihilation Of Caste Is An Undelivered Speech By Dr. B.r.ambedkar Which He Later Self-published In 1936. The Subject Of The Speech Was Based On The Harmful Effects Of Casteism In The Hindu Society. It Was Written To Be Used As The Presidential Address For The Jat-pat Todak Mandal Annual Conference, Which Is A Reformist Hindu Group. However, This Invitation Was Withheld Sometime Down The Line As The Address Was Labelled To Have ‘unbearable’ Content. Gandhiji Also Made Some Strict Remarks About The Speech Accusing It Of Being Anti-congress. In The After Edition Of This Book, Dr. B.r. Ambedkar Replied To Mahatma Gandhi’s Comments That He Had Made In His Magazine Harijaan. It Was Translated In Tamil In The Year 1937. This Essay Talks About The Caste System And The Need For Its Destruction. He Felt That In Order To Annihilate Caste, India Needs To Debunk The Manusmritis. He Discussed Several Ways In Which The Discrimination Based On Caste Could Be Erased. He Was A Supporter Of The Inter-caste Marriages. He Advocated The Absolute Destruction Of Archaic Texts That Have Been Perpetuating Caste System And The Rules Around It From The Indian Society. This Essay Is Still Very Relevant For India Because Of The National Debate And Tremor That Has Been Felt, Especially In The Education Sector Due To Politics Channelled Through The Caste System. Reading Ambedkar’s Revolutionizing Speech In ‘annihilation Of Caste’ Opens Your Eyes To The Perils Faced By The Dalit Community And Makes You Aware Of Their Fight For Equality. Dr. B.r.ambedkar Wanted Everyone To Realize That Dalits Are An Integral Part Of Our Society And Not Just A Mere Pawn In The Political Ideology.

• B.R. Ambedkar is one of the leading progressive, liberal thinkers of India whose contributions to making of Indian Constitution and its mandate of a social revolution are unparalleled.
• Dhananjay Keerregards Ambedkar is among the foremost leader of Dalits in India who played a critical role on raising dalit conciseness. In his work, ‘Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development’, Ambedkar identifies caste as an important institution, which is practiced by no other civilized society, past or contemporary.
• Ambedkar noted that the ancient Hindu society was composed of classes– Brahmans, the Kshatriya, the Vaishayas and the Shudrasthat became self-closed units called castes through the practice of endogamy.but roped in other features such as division of labour, absence of inter-dining and the principle of birth as well.
• Gopal Gurutalks of Ambedkar’s argument wherein even in Vedic times, people self-identified as per their caste rather as Hindus. This hierarchical social order was purposefully used to keep a section of population in a state of illiteracy, poverty and oppression.
• The worst of caste system was reflected in the practice of untouchability which used the notions of purity and pollution to keep an untouchable outside the fold of social interaction.
• He did not subscribe to the position that untouchability has its basis in race. He saw it as a social institution defended by the ideology of Brahmanismas propounded in his ‘broken men thesis’.
• Unlike Gandhi who sought to reform caste system, Ambedkar propounded its complete annihilation of caste for the emancipation of Dalits. However, the strategy for liberation argues Jaffrelotwitnessed oscillation between two methods.
  • One was the promotion of the Untouchables in Hindu society or in the Indian nation as a whole; and the second strategy of a break that could take the form of a separate electorate, or of a separate Dalit party and/or of conversion outside Hinduism.
• While the first method was imbibed in the Constitutional practices of equality and rights for the Dalits, the second strategy was concretised in his monograph titled ‘Annihilation of Caste’. Valerian Rodriguesremarks that Ambedkar believed caste to have destroyed public spirit and was a blot on Hinduism.
• Ambedkar explored a variety of mechanisms to abolish class including promotion inter-dining but most importantly inter-marriage to break through caste silos. Eventually Ambedkar came to believe that annihilation of caste was not possible while remaining in the Hindu fold. Guru believes that Ambedkar’s conversion to Buddhism was a final strategy to create ‘negative’ consciousness among Dalitsagainst the hegemony of Brahminism and end the menace of caste, a fight that is still ongoing in India.